CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION: PEDAGOGY FOR LEARNING FROM FAILURE IN PROCESS PLANT OPERATIONS

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION: PEDAGOGY FOR LEARNING FROM FAILURE IN PROCESS PLANT OPERATIONS

S. CHEAH (2023).  CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION: PEDAGOGY FOR LEARNING FROM FAILURE IN PROCESS PLANT OPERATIONS. 94-109.

The aim of this paper is to propose a pedagogy based on learning from failure to develop the confidence and competency that graduates from the Diploma in Chemical Engineering needed to function effectively in their job role as process technicians in the chemical processing industries. It is further suggested that the CDIO Framework can be used to achieve this aim. The paper first highlights the danger of losing vital cognitive skills due to increased automation and digitalization; and also explains the limitation of learning using simulations, despite these being the most dominant way of preparing students for work. Next, it introduces the concept of learning from failure; and argued that the prevailing approach of “Learning from Accidents” is not always effective, especially when one lacks the necessary scientific knowhow and understanding of complexities of issues involved. The modular way of teaching, where different engineering fundamentals (e.g. fluid flow, heat transfer, etc) are taught in separate modules by different lecturers, often resulted in the opposite outcome: “designing out failure”. Problem solving often means working through questions that focus on applying the correct equations within the confine of the respective module; often neglecting the need to use valid data. Students are not taught to integrate the knowledge until later year of study by creating a computer model of a chemical plant. This paper then suggests a pedagogy for learning from failure that can be formulated to sensitize students to the notion of failure as a form of learning, rather than as an outcome to be avoided. In the context of chemical plant operation, this means that one must be able to make sense of big data, notably the relationships between process variables in plant operations. This will address the issue of “unknown knowns”, referring to situations where students were unable to see the connections between knowledge learnt from different modules in problem analysis. This paper illustrates how the CDIO Framework, along with a set of principles for learning from failure, can be used to design an integrated curriculum that progressively develop a new “failure-tolerant” mindset, using integrated learning experiences infused with “deliberate failure” to scaffold learning in process plant operations. Such learning can start with students being aware of interdependencies of various process variables, moving on to interactions between different plant equipment during operation. This paper concludes with discussion on how such new mindset can be further developed using the pedagogy presented.

Authors (New): 
Sin-Moh CHEAH
Pages: 
94-109
Affiliations: 
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
Learning from Failure
Digitalization
Chemical Engineering
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 7
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Borowski, A. (2013). Book Review: The Glass Cage: Where Automation is Taking Us by Nicholas Carr, LSE Review of Books, London School of Economics and Political Science: 
Cannon, M.D. & Edmondson, A.C. (2005). Failing to Learn and Learning to Fail (Intelligently): How Great Organizations Put Failure to Work to Innovate and Improve, Long Range Planning, Vol.38, pp.299-319: 
Carr, N. (2014). The Glass Cage: Automation and Us, W.M. Norton & Company, New York, London: 
Cheah, S.M. (2021). Sustainable Development in Chemical Engineering Curriculum: Review and Moving Ahead, Proceedings of the 17th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chulalongkorn University & Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, June 21-23; Bangkok, Thailand: 
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadley, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T. & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, Vol.90, No.4, pp.499-541: 
Choudhari, A. (2020). Should You Rely on Your Simulation Results? PTQ Magazine, Q4, pp.47-51: 
Dobson, J.A., Nieto, Y.C., Dobson, L. & Ochoa, A.M. (2021). Success through Failure: Towards a Problem-based Approach to Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, Vol.4, Issue 3, pp.225-260: 
Dominici, P. (2019). Educating for the Future in the Age of Obsolescence, IEEE 18th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC), July 23-25; Milan, Italy: 
Drupsteen, L., Groeneweg, J. & Zwetsloot, G.I.J.M. (2013). Critical Steps in Learning From Incidents: Using Learning Potential in the Process From Reporting an Incident to Accident Prevention, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 19:1, pp.63-77: 
Edmondson, A.C. (2011). Strategies for Learning from Failure, Harvard Business Review, April Issue: 
Ellis, G. (2018). The “Watermelon Effect” – Does a Green Dashboard mean a Healthy Facility?”, Loss Prevention Bulletin, No.264, Institution of Chemical Engineers: 
ESReDA (2015). Barriers to Learning from Incidents and Accidents, European Safety, Reliability & Data Association: 
Gajek, A., Fabiano, B., Laurent, A. & Jensen, N. (2022). Process Safety Education of Future Employee 4.0 in Industry 4.0, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol.75, pp.1-29: 
Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, Vol.16, pp.235-266: 
Huth, J. (2016). Book Review: The Glass Cage: Where Automation is Taking Us by Nicholas Carr, American Journal of Physics, Vol.84, No.7, pp.565: 
Kletz, T. (2001). Learning from Accidents, 3rd. Ed, Tailor & Francis: 
Jackson, A., Godwin, A., Bartholomew, S. & Mentzer, N. (2022). Learning from Failure: A Systematized Review, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol.32, pp.1853-1873: 
Jefferson, M., Chung, P.W.H. & Kletz, T.A. (1997). Learning the Lessons from Past Accidents, Hazards XXIII, IChemE Symposium Series No.141, pp.217-226: 
Jofriet, P. (2005). Alarm Management: Process and System Alarms are Intended to Assure Efficient Process-Plant Operations and Even, Occasionally, Save Lives. But in Too Many Plants, the Alarm System has Paradoxically Evolved into a Nuisance. A Five-step Procedure can Put a Degenerate Alarm System Aright, Chemical Engineering, Vol.112, No.2: 
Lindberg, A-K., Hansson, S.O. & Rollenhagen, C. (2010). Learning from Accidents – What More Do We Need to Know? Safety Science, Vol. 48, Issue 6, pp.714-721: 
Logan, D.C. (2009). Known Knowns, Known Unknowns, Unknown Unknowns and the Propagation of Scientific Enquiry, Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol.60, No.3, pp.712-714: 
Mannan, M.S. & Waldram, S.P. (2014). Learning Lessons from Incidents: A Paradigm Shift is Overdue, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol.92, Issue 6, pp.760-765: 
Noda, M.(2012). Research Challenges in Alarm Management for Safe and Stable Plant Operations in Chemical Process Industries, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Vol.31, pp.107-114: 
RoSPA (2015). Learning to Learn from Accidents, Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents: 
Servant-Miklos, V. (2020). Problem-oriented Project Work and Problem-based Learning: “Mind the Gap!”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, Vol.14, Issue 1, pp.107-122: 
Silverstein, D.L. (2004). Process Simulation Failure as a Learning Tool, Proceedings of the 111th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20-23; Salt Lake City, Utah: 
Sitkin, S.B. (1996). Learning Through Failure: The Strategy of Small Losses, in Organizational Learning, Cohen, M.D. & Sproull, L.S. (eds), Thousand Oaks, CA Sage: 
Tawfik, A.A., Rong, H. & Choi, I. (2015). Failing to Learn: Towards a Unified Design Approach for Failure-based Learning, Educational Technology Research & Development, Vol.63, pp.975-994: 
Weibull, B., Fredstrom, C. & Wood, M.H. (2020). Lessons Learned from Accidents: Key Points and Conclusions for Seveso Inspectors of Major Chemical Hazard Sites, EUR 30391 EN, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: 
Zandi, M., Glassey, J. & Young, B. (2022). Mind the Gap, The Chemical Engineer, October, pp.41-43: 
Go to top
randomness