DEVELOPMENT OF MEANINGFUL LESSON USING LXD METHODOLOGY FOR AN ENGINEERING MODULE

DEVELOPMENT OF MEANINGFUL LESSON USING LXD METHODOLOGY FOR AN ENGINEERING MODULE

Z. Meijun, E. Foo, F. TIO, K. Wee (2023).  DEVELOPMENT OF MEANINGFUL LESSON USING LXD METHODOLOGY FOR AN ENGINEERING MODULE. 273-282.

According to literature, learning is most meaningful when it is deliberately applied in real-life contexts by incorporating real-life contexts that facilitate active, constructive, intentional, and collaborative engagement into learning.  This will help learners to achieve longer retention of what they have learned compared to memorising and rote learning. In Nanyang Polytechnic, Singapore, a Learning Experience Design (LXD) Methodology was developed to guide and support educators in the design of good learning experiences that are meaningful to learners and to achieve our goal of engaging and effective teaching and learning. This paper explains how we developed the meaningful lessons for an engineering module, focusing on application, problem-solving and collaboration.  To examine whether the learners perceived the learning to be more meaningful after attending the lessons that are redesigned using the LXD methodology, a comparison study was conducted involving about 90 learners in the Diploma of Robotics & Mechatronics. The results indicated that learners in the experimental group perceived more meaningful learning and scored higher in the post-course test than the control group. In addition, the reflection on our experiences in going through the four recommended processes in the LXD Methodology, namely learner discovery, supporting learners in attaining learning outcomes, designing the learning experience, and evaluating for improvement will also be discussed.  These reflections can be used as a case study to share with other educators who would like to design meaningful lesson to achieve a more engaging experience for learners. The last part of the paper highlights the challenges faced and provides improvement to further fine-tune and streamline the on-going implementation effort. 

Authors (New): 
Zhao Meijun
Edwin Foo
Flex TIO
Kwek Siew Wee
Pages: 
273-282
Affiliations: 
Nanyang Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
Meaningful learning
Learning Experience Design
Statistical Analysis
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Ang , C. K., & Ngu, M. K. (2014). Meaningful Learning in the Teaching of Culture: The Project Based Learning Approach. Journal of Education and Training Studies.: 
Anno. (24 04, 2023). CDIO implementation. Retrieved from http://www.cdio.org/implementing-cdio-yourinstitution/implementation-kit: 
Anno. (24 04, 2023). NYP Playbook. Retrieved from NYP Playbook: https://staff.nyp.edu.sg/sites/intranet/groups/2053/LXD%20Wiki/LXD%20Methodology.aspx: 
Anno. (24 04, 2023). SPSS Tutorials: Analyzing Data. Retrieved from https://libguides.library.kent.edu/SPSS/AnalyzeData: 
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. Grune & Stratton.: 
Barlow, A. (2020). Development of the Student Course Cognitive Engagement Instrument (SCCEI) for College Engineering Courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7-22.: 
Bruun, E., & Kjærgaard, C. (2011). A Model For The Development Of A CDIO Based Curriculum In Electrical Engineering. 7th International CDIO Conference. DTU, Denmark.: 
Floor, N. (24 04, 2023). Leanring Experience Canvas. Retrieved from LXD: https://lxd.org/learning-experience-canvas/: 
Fun, S. (24 04, 2023). Adventures in Science: How to Use Rotary Encoders. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/oLBYHbLO8W0: 
Howland, J. L., Jonassen , D. H., & Marra, R. (2011). Meaningful Learning with Technology. Pearson.: 
Johannes, D. H. (2006). Modelling for Meaningful Learning. Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies, 1-27.: 
Jonassen, D. (2005). Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 139-151.: 
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J. J., Moore, J. L., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to Solve Problems with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Prentice Hall.: 
Loyer, S., Munoz, M., Cardenas, C., Martinez, C., Cepeda, M., & Faundez , V. (2011). A CDIO Approach to Curriculum Design of Five Engineering Programs at UCSC. 7th International CDIO Conference.: 
Malmqvist, J., Huay, H. L.-W., Kontio, J., & Minh, T. D. (2012). APPLICATION OF CDIO IN NON-ENGINEERING PROGRAMMES – MOTIVES, IMPLEMENTATION AND EXPERIENCES. In J. Björkqvist, K. Edström, R. J. Hugo, J. Kontio, J. Roslöf, R. Sellens, & S. Virtanen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference (pp. 84-101). Turku, Finland: Turku University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166104.pdf: 
Novak, J. D. (2007). Human Constructivism: A Unification of Psychological and Epistemological Phenomena in Meaning Making. Human Constructivism: A Unification of Psychological and Epistemological Phenomena in Meaning Making (pp. 167−193). International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 167-193.: 
Realpars. (24 04, 2023). What is encoder? Retrieved from Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2GQVJ4z0kM&t=308s: 
Teoh, F. (n.d.). Learner-Centric Blended Learning Plan for an Engineering Module. 13th International Symposium on Advances in Technology Education (ISATE).: 
Teresa J. Getha-Eby, e. a. (2014). Meaningful Learning: Theoretical Support for Concept-Based Teaching (pp. 494-500). Journal of Nursing Education, 494-500.: 
Vallori, A. B. (2014). Meaningful Learning in Practice. Journal of Education and Human Development, 199-209.: 
Go to top