A UNIFIED DIDACTIC FOUNDATION FOR AARHUS UNIVERSITY’S TECH FACULTY: EXPERIENCES AND IMPACT

A UNIFIED DIDACTIC FOUNDATION FOR AARHUS UNIVERSITY’S TECH FACULTY: EXPERIENCES AND IMPACT

J. Bennedsen, G. ien (2024).  A UNIFIED DIDACTIC FOUNDATION FOR AARHUS UNIVERSITY’S TECH FACULTY: EXPERIENCES AND IMPACT.

This paper describes the data collection and analysis of a survey on the awareness and usefulness of a didactic foundation among the educational management at Aarhus University’s TECH faculty. The didactic foundation is a document containing a set of principles and guidelines for designing and delivering high-quality education. The survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire that was sent to 31 respondents who had different roles in the educational management, such as head of degree program, deputy head of department, vice dean, etc. The response rate was 68%. The research found that most respondents are aware of the didactic foundation document and see it as a useful tool for enhancing teaching quality and communication. Despite its usefulness, implementation is hindered by lack of resources, unclear mandates, and lack of motivation among faculty. The content is generally agreed upon, but respondents highlight challenges in practical implementation. The responses may reflect the dual roles of respondents as both teachers and part of the educational management. The paper describes several follow-up strategies. It emphasizes the importance of making educational resources easily accessible and fostering communication among educational management, teachers, and students. It suggests conducting a follow-up study to understand the level of awareness about the didactic foundation among students and teachers. We also highlight the need for integrating the foundation into existing events like pedagogical days and section meetings, to avoid ‘meeting fatigue’ and foster discourse on educational quality. Finally, the paper underscores the didactic foundation’s role in facilitating a smooth transition for new students and promoting student retention.

Authors (New): 
Jens Bennedsen
Geir Egil Dahle Øien
Affiliations: 
Aarhus University, Denmark
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Keywords: 
pedagogical development
didactic foundation
Education quality
teaching and learning
Change Management
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2024
Reference: 
Buller, J. L. (2014). Change leadership in higher education: A practical guide to academic transformation. John Wiley & Sons.: 
D’Andrea, V., & Gosling, D. (2005). Improving teaching and learning in higher education. A whole institution approach. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.: 
Gedda, O., Wikberg-Nilsson, Å., Garvare, R., & Edström. (2016). Waves of reform: analysing a history of educational development concepts. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference (pp. 302 - 312). Turku, Finland: Turku University of Applied Sciences.: 
Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality. Heslington, York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.: 
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9 - 34.: 
https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
Krücken, G. (2014). Higher education reforms and unintended consequences: a research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1439-1450.: 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949539
Middaugh, M. F. (2010). Planning and Assessment in Higher Education: Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (John Wiley & Sons).: 
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education &.: 
TECH faculty at Aarhus University. (2023, February 2). Didactic foundation. Retrieved January 12, 2024, from https://tech.medarbejdere.au.dk/en: https://kvalitet.au.dk/fileadmin/kvalitetsportal/NAT_og_TECH/TECH/20230112_didactic_foundation_-_EN.pdf: 
Tight, M. (2010). Are Academic Workloads Increasing? The Post-War Survey Evidence in the UK. Higher Education Quarterly, 64, 200-215.: 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2009.00433.x
Tight, M. (2012). Researching Higher Education, second edition. Berkshire, England: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.: 
Tinto, V. (2012). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago press.: 
Warfvinge, P., Roxå, T., & Löfgreen, J. (2018). What influences teachers to develop their pedagogical practice? Procedings of LTHs 10:e Pedagogiska Inspirationskonferens. Lund, Sweden. Retrieved from https://ojs.lub.lu.se/pige/article/view/21244: 
Ödalen, J., Brommesson, D., Erlingsson, G. Ó., Schaffer, J. K., & Fogelgren, M. (2019). Teaching university teachers to become better teachers: the effects of pedagogical training courses at six Swedish universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 339-353.: 
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1512955
Øien, G., & Bennedsen, J. (2023). DEVELOPING A DIDACTIC FOUNDATION FOR THE TECH FACULTY AT AARHUS UNIVERSITY. Proceedings for the 19th CDIO Conference, (pp. 45-55). Trondheim, Norway.: 
Go to top